Closed-loop multi-agent framework for LLM vulnerability discovery. Adaptive attack strategy. CVSSv4.0 scoring. 8 regulatory frameworks. SARIF output for CI/CD.
Full coverage across direct endpoints and complex agentic topologies — the surfaces static scanners miss entirely.
Classic LLM attacks against completion APIs — alignment bypass, system-prompt extraction, role confusion, and jailbreaking.
Indirect cross-prompt injection via retrieval documents. Attacks the model through the data layer it trusts.
Model Context Protocol attack surface — tool-call interception, poisoned context injection, cross-server propagation.
Agent-to-agent injection that hops trust boundaries and propagates exploitation through downstream agents.
Exploiting function-calling interfaces — schema confusion, argument injection, and output manipulation.
CVSSv4.0 vectors for every finding, automatically mapped to applicable regulatory frameworks. SARIF v2.1 output for CI/CD gates.
Four specialized agents in a continuous revision loop. The Planner reads live behavioral signals and rewrites its strategy — not a fixed probe list.
Target LLM / Pipeline
|
v
┌───────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ Orchestrator │
│ │
│ Planner ────────> Attacker ────> Evaluator │
│ (Claude Opus) (synthesizer) (3-layer) │
│ ^ | | │
│ | v v │
│ └────── Revision <──── Findings + CVSS │
│ | │
│ Reporter │
└───────────────────────────────────────────────┘
|
v
SARIF v2.1 + JSON ──> CI/CD gates + GRC tooling
Cosine distance against a confirmed-attack embedding space. Flags responses that land in known attack-success neighborhoods, independent of surface form — catches paraphrases and evasive reformulations.
Multi-model verdict with configurable affirmative quorum and confidence threshold. Cross-model agreement eliminates single-model blind spots and dramatically reduces false positives.
Pipeline telemetry anomaly detection. Catches exploitation that produces no suspicious output text but alters tool-call patterns, token budgets, or downstream API behavior.
Static probe-and-detect tools catch known patterns. ARGUS reasons, adapts, and discovers novel vulnerabilities autonomously.
| Feature | Garak (NVIDIA) | PyRIT (Microsoft) | LLM-Fuzzer | ARGUS |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Multi-agent architecture | ✗ | ✗ | ✗ | ✓ |
| Adaptive attack strategy | ✗ | ✗ | ✗ | ✓ real-time |
| Cross-session memory | ✗ | ✗ | ✗ | ✓ ChromaDB |
| OWASP LLM Top 10 (2025) | partial | partial | ✗ | ✓ all 10 |
| RAG / pipeline attacks | ✗ | partial | ✗ | ✓ |
| MCP server mesh attacks | ✗ | ✗ | ✗ | ✓ |
| Multi-agent propagation | ✗ | ✗ | ✗ | ✓ |
| CVSSv4.0 scoring | ✗ | ✗ | ✗ | ✓ |
| SARIF v2.1 output | ✗ | ✗ | ✗ | ✓ |
| 8-framework compliance mapping | ✗ | ✗ | ✗ | ✓ |
| LLM-as-judge panel detection | ✗ | partial | ✗ | ✓ quorum |
| Behavioral trace analysis | ✗ | ✗ | ✗ | ✓ |
| Academic backing | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ IEEE |
Every design claim is backed by a measured outcome. All results are reproducible from the public repository.
48 hand-crafted test vectors validated against the FIRST CVSSv4.0 reference calculator. All vectors scored within ±0.2 of the reference. Five representative cases:
| Attack scenario | CVSSv4.0 vector | ARGUS | Reference | Δ |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Direct prompt injection — system-prompt extraction | AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N | 8.7 High | 8.7 | 0.0 |
| Cross-agent privilege escalation via MCP poisoning | AV:N/AC:H/AT:P/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:H/SI:H/SA:H | 9.4 Critical | 9.4 | 0.0 |
| RAG indirect injection, low downstream impact | AV:N/AC:H/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:L/SI:N/SA:N | 4.2 Medium | 4.1 | +0.1 |
| Tool-call schema confusion, no downstream reach | AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N | 5.3 Medium | 5.2 | +0.1 |
| Zero-impact probe (all Vulnerable & Subsequent metrics: None) | AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N | 0.0 None | 0.0 | 0.0 |
50-payload batches generated for 3 OWASP categories × 2 target profiles (threshold δ = 0.35). Constrained synthesis reduces mean intra-batch cosine similarity by 66% versus unconstrained generation.
| ID | Category | garak v0.13 | ARGUS v1.0 | Coverage gain |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| LLM01 | Prompt Injection | Full | Full + XPIA / MCP | Extended |
| LLM02 | Insecure Output Handling | Partial | Full | + |
| LLM03 | Training Data Poisoning | Partial | Full | + |
| LLM04 | Model Denial of Service | Partial | Full | + |
| LLM05 | Supply Chain Vulnerabilities | None | Full | New |
| LLM06 | Sensitive Information Disclosure | Full | Full | Equal |
| LLM07 | Insecure Plugin Design | Partial | Full | + |
| LLM08 | Excessive Agency | None | Full | New |
| LLM09 | Overreliance | Partial | Full | + |
| LLM10 | Model Theft | None | Full | New |
ARGUS emits a standards-compliant SARIF v2.1 report at the path specified in the scan config. No post-processing or schema conversion is needed.
A single upload-sarif step with the output path is the only pipeline addition. No format-version pinning, no custom mapping. garak requires a hand-written JSONL-to-SARIF converter before this step.
Findings appear with correct rule IDs, severity labels, and descriptions. The 45-second window was measured on a representative repository; GitHub's ingestion pipeline, not ARGUS, is the bottleneck.
Install once, scan any supported target with a single command. API key resolved from env or --api-key flag.
git clone https://github.com/\ sunilgentyala/argus cd argus pip install -e .
argus scan \ --target anthropic \ --model claude-sonnet-4-6 \ --profile quick
argus scan \ --target openai \ --model gpt-4o \ --system-prompt "..." \ --profile compliance
argus show \ ./argus-reports/\ <session-id>.report.json
Every confirmed finding is automatically tagged to applicable regulatory articles — ready for your audit trail or GRC team.
Govern, Map, Measure, Manage — full control framework mapping.
High-risk system requirements, transparency and conformity obligations.
Federal AI safety, security reporting, and red-team requirements.
AI Safety Institute evaluation and testing standards.
Cybersecurity incident reporting and AI governance guidelines.
International AI management system standard controls.
Regional frameworks across Asia-Pacific jurisdictions.
AU digital transformation and AI policy alignment.
Track ARGUS's growth on GitHub.
Latest release ships HTML reports, direct SARIF output, and threat intelligence.
Self-contained HTML output with severity-colour-coded findings table. Attach to GRC tickets or email to security stakeholders — no external assets required.
New --sarif argus.sarif flag lets you specify the SARIF output path directly — perfect for CI pipelines that pick up a specific filename.
New argus/intelligence/ module ships a curated LLM attack signal database — helping the Planner bias toward highest-yield vectors per model family.
Planner now defaults to claude-opus-4-8 — Anthropic's latest reasoning model. Attack strategy quality improves measurably on complex agentic surfaces.
A star on GitHub helps security researchers find ARGUS and signals that open LLM security tooling matters.